Must-read & great tips by @joshk for #seed #startup #entrepreneurs to prepare for a tough reality check at Series A
Thanks a lot @joshk, founder of First Round Capital, for sharing thoughts on what the seed surge implicates for raising a Series A.
I can see a very similar situation here in the Swiss ecosystem. Seed money is relatively easy to get. But more efforts are now required to pave the way for proving inflection points with solid data and proof of traction towards Series A investment rounds.
Key tips:
-
The Series A crunch is happening industry-wide, busting funding rounds and limiting startups’ potential.
-
That said, it’s never been a better time to be an entrepreneur raising seed funding. It’s 4x more available.
-
To avoid the crunch, only start a Series A fundraising process after you’ve hit major milestones. Starting too early is very risky.
-
Be rational about the size of the round you want to raise. It’s always easier to increase a round than to shrink it, so let the market bid you up.
-
Consider raising a larger seed round to give yourself more runway to rack up more proof points before your A.
-
Take your time during your seed round to choose the right investors who will help you raise the next round.
-
Know what the key inflection points are that you need to hit to show successful step change.
-
Give yourself enough time in the market to get the volume of data you need, and figure out what is most compelling to share with prospective investors.
-
Don’t panic. Do everything you can to prepare for the next step.
Full article
Shortly after my first child was born, a friend gave me a copy of a book called “The Blessing of a Skinned Knee.” The book was full of contrarian wisdom. While most new parents’ natural instincts are to improve their child’s life by removing obstacles, eliminating every potential source of pain, and helping them avoid adversity, the author of the book cautioned against overprotecting your child. Specifically, her thesis was that grit and resilience are extremely important life skills, and that it is important for people to learn how to overcome adversity (like a skinned knee) at a young age. That way they aren’t surprised when they inevitably experience obstacles at an older age.
There has never been a better time to be an entrepreneur. The number of seed-funded companies has quadrupled over the last four years. Over 200 Micro-VC firms have recently raised over $4 billion to invest at the earliest of stages. AngelList and FundersClub are growing in popularity. This all adds up to an awesome environment for entrepreneurs to get started. While it used to take weeks or months to raise a seed round, we’re now seeing some rounds get raised in a matter of days. Incubators and accelerators are pushing out larger numbers of companies — many getting term sheets within hours of walking off the demo day stage.
I recently worked with a team of talented, young founders who had raised their Series Seed financing without breaking a sweat. They had their choice of investors (I’m thankful they chose us) and their seed round was oversubscribed by 2x. They set out to raise their Series A round six months later — and they were in for a rude awakening. They ended up raising money, but not as much as they hoped for, it was much much harder than they expected and took months to cross the finish line. In the CEO’s words, “Our seed round was super fast and hyper-competitive, and then we went into the A and started getting interrogated about our data. It was like graduating from elementary school straight into college.”
This experience mirrors that of many founders and startups I’ve seen both inside and outside the First Round community. I believe, across our industry, the unprecedented amounts of seed funding available to startups early on is setting them up for a tough reality check at Series A. You can call it a “crunch” or whatever you’d like, but it’s significantly impacting companies’ long-term success. Looking at this trend, I think the key is to stay lean and thoughtful after the initial money hits the bank.
Below is my thinking on why this is so critical, and what founders can do to avoid getting killed in the crunch.
What’s Happening?
Seed funding is more plentiful and easier to raise today than I’ve ever seen during my career. What that means, ironically, is that this makes everything much harder. It sets an expectation — especially for young, first-time founders — that something they expected to be challenging is relatively easy, and this sets strong expectations for the next time they do it. The problem is that the number of A rounds hasn’t changed. That amount of Series A capital HAS NOT increased. So, if you have 4x the number of companies with seed funding, that’s 4x the players competing for the same money… making it 4x harder to raise an A round than it was five years ago.
I talk to a lot of founders about their Series A experience, and more often than not they say they were shocked by how hard it was to get a term sheet, how long the process took, and how much more complex the conversations got. As one CEO I spoke to noted, “The way that seed funding is all about your idea and team, Series A is all about the numbers. We weren’t tracking cohorts or anything at all. I didn’t know about LTV or CAC, or how to answer questions about the economics of scale. We walked into an interrogation that we weren’t prepared for.”
One reason this happens is that founders mistake casual conversations with VCs for serious interest. Founders get a bunch of emails or calls from VCs, and then feel like they have to start their fundraising process immediately or miss out. This can (and does) lead to a lot of hasty pitching before companies are ready. And here’s the deal on the VC side: both partners and associates are paid to get out there and build relationships with promising young companies, but there’s no commitment. Investors want to make sure they get “the call” from founders when they begin fundraising — so they’re motivated to send “happy vibes” in order to stay around the hoop. These happy vibes are heard by a founder’s “happy ears” — often leading the founder to draw false conclusions about the true level of potential VC interest.
Series A investors are always looking to catch a company before they run an official process, as it’s almost always in their best interest to pre-empt a competitive funding situation. That means that they’re aggressive in trying to get early meetings. As first-time founders see their inboxes fill with email from VCs, they often assume that the volume and intensity of VC interest will translate into an easy funding round — and often (mistakenly) decide to start a fundraising process too soon.
The real danger with pitching earlier than you planned is that you probably haven’t hit the right milestones yet and haven’t had the time to set up a fundraising strategy. After raising a seed round, every startup should get smart about the inflection points they need to pass in growth, revenue, etc. to demonstrate the traction (customer acceptance, virality, revenue, engagement, etc.) they need to land a Series A. It’s more important than ever to hit those goals as Series A investors have more choices than ever to fill each general partners’ 1 to 3 investments a year.
There’s enormous risk in raising too early that many founders forget.
Once a company has taken more than a handful of meetings, it can be viewed as a “shopped deal.” Information travels quickly in the startup community. Great fundraising processes are run tightly, like a tactical mission. Containing information is a huge advantage for founders. If a VC knows that 20 of her peers have already had a look and passed, that’s some serious negative signaling. How many people eat at a restaurant after 20 of their friends tell them it stinks?
Of course, there are some VCs who can avoid the herd mentality — but even with them, you’ll likely start at a deficit. Of course that doesn’t mean you won’t be able to raise a financing in the future, it just means you’re setting yourself for a much bigger challenge. Once a deal is shopped, you often need to demonstrate more traction by focusing on solid execution for 9 to 12 months before you can take another swing.
It’s almost impossible for a startup to get a second fresh look.
Another, related trend we’re seeing is that startups are seeking larger and larger A rounds. It’s pretty clear that the market can’t accommodate it, yet we keep seeing companies setting out to raise $15 to $20 million Series A rounds — just a few months after they’ve raised their seed round. To invest $15 million, an investor needs to have 3x the conviction that that they have for a $5 million investment. I think this desire to raise $15M+ at series A is being caused by a couple different things.
Founders often see a handful of data points and believe that a new normal exists. For example, a given founder sees their friend raise a large Series A and sees a few tech press articles on large Series A’s and they immediately believe they can do it too. Of course, it might be possible. But it’s far from typical.
I also hear a lot of later-stage investors giving early-stage founders bad advice. For example, a founder takes a first meeting on Sand Hill Road and mentions a large target round size. When the investor doesn’t blink, the founder now thinks it’s achievable, even if it’s not.
A simple piece of advice: It’s much easier to increase a round size than to decrease it.
I can’t tell you the number of stories I’ve heard about rounds that failed because founders raised too early and asked for too much. It’s an industry phenomenon, but founders’ mindsets are only just now beginning to change.
I think founders vastly underestimate the risk of busted financing.
So, What Should Founders Do?
The good news is that companies don’t have to fall into the Series A trap. There are a lot of opportunities to capitalize on these same trends and use them to your advantage.
For example, some of the smartest founders I work with are taking advantage of the seed funding boom to raise larger early rounds, buying themselves more time to get more done and hit more of those critical inflection points. If you’re only new and shiny once, get as much out of it as you can.
You’re suddenly judged on the data that you should have been collecting all along to show traction, growth, potential. So why not raise $2.5M in seed money instead of $1.5M to give yourself the best shot at perfecting this data? You should target 18 to 24 months of runway post Series Seed. The best time to raise follow-on capital is when you don’t need it, and 2 years of runway gives you the best chance to land in that situation.
The other benefit of raising seed money in today’s environment is that more companies have their choice of which seed investors to work with. There’s a chance to be more thoughtful about the investors you want.
My advice: Do your research and see which firms and people have a track record of working hard to help their startups win. While there are some super-angels who add tremendous value, there are others who are neither super nor angelic.
Rather than having a “party round” full of VC firm logos, I believe founders are better served by having investors who will roll up their sleeves and open doors, make introductions, help source and recruit great talent, give feedback on a Series A pitch, and call in favors to make things happen. And make sure that your investor is willing to do real work for a seed investment. It’s tough for a firm that writes both $250K checks and $25M checks to offer the same level of service and support.
Once you have the money in the bank, you need to pause and map things out carefully. It always surprises me how startups fail to plan realistically around their spending. It’s vital that you have a clear picture of the traction and proof points you’ll need to show investors when you eventually do raise your A. And these proof points have to both demonstrate a significant jump in valuation and de-risk your concept. That is more difficult given how expensive good people are and the current price of Bay Area real estate.
It’s much easier than you think to spend $1 million.
Keeping your burn rate low until you have product-market fit will give you the best chance at building a big company.
So many companies say, “Alright, we have 12 months worth of cash, let’s launch in 11 months.” This isn’t a good plan.
If you take 11 months building your product, even if you assume you’ll ship on time (which hardly ever happens), you’ll run out of runway before you really know what it’s like to be out in the market collecting data. There’s nothing that increases your odds of a successful A round like a successful launch followed by customers that really love what you’ve built.
A successful launch is defined by the months that come after it. Let’s say you’re an eCommerce company and you know the Christmas holidays will represent 40% of your revenue to date. You don’t want to be in a position where you have to raise in November. You’re going to want to make sure you have enough cash on hand to raise in February after the milestone.
These inflection points change year to year — so be sure you know what’s currently fundable. For example, in the hardware space, a year ago, $1M in pre-sales on Kickstarter with a great product idea was sometimes enough to raise a Series A. Now, investors are demanding pre-sales in the millions with a product that’s either functional or actually in production given the risk of bringing hardware to market.
When thinking about timing, remember, a good fundraising process will take between 4 and 8 weeks. Adding in preparation and time to close, you’re talking a few months. Remember this math when you’re thinking about timeline and proof points. Cutting things too close can be dangerous.
Keep in mind that capturing this data isn’t enough, either. Your Series A pitch should be much more polished and rehearsed than you probably think. While it’s an uncomfortable thing to do, and easy to dodge, your fundraising pitch is a make-or-break proposition. I’ve seen founders who spend more time working on weekly payroll than their pitch. You literally have to make it the most important, if not only, priority once you start the process.
Founders need to be able to demonstrate mastery of their numbers in conversation.
We recommended spending no less than 4 weeks preparing for a Series A. We’ve even gone as far as to build an internal team at First Round called “Pitch Assist” that works with our founders to nail the strongest fundraising story.
All of this can make it sound like you should start rationing funds immediately. But there’s no need to be that extreme. You don’t want to hobble yourself when you really should be building and growing fast. Raising a larger seed and regularly checking your progress against the milestones you need to hit will put you in a good position.
Get the feedback you need from your advisors and other entrepreneurs about the proof points they think you’ll need to show. Prioritize advice from people who have worked in a similar sector or know your business model best. If you’re a SaaS business, get advisors or seed investors that know this space cold. They should understand the exact metrics in the market that are generating strong interest from follow-on investors.
Depending on your business, you may create more enterprise value with aggressive customer growth instead of a monetization strategy. Progress in all dimensions is not the same when it comes to persuading investors. I highly recommend doing diligence on the firms you really want in your A round. Talk to other entrepreneurs who have pitched them or seed investors who know them to find out what they usually ask or expect. Firms are extremely diverse when it comes to what they want to see from entrepreneurs. The more you know, the more you can tailor your strategy to each meeting.
Adversity is not necessarily a bad thing. As Walt Disney once said: “All the adversity I’ve had in life, all my troubles and obstacles, have strengthened me… You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you.” Starting a company is not easy. It’s hard to build an awesome product, to hire talented people, and to raise capital. Don’t let the Series Seed Surge fool you into thinking that future financings won’t be a struggle.
Interesting European Innovation Financing report by Clipperton Finance
Interesting 2014 report compiled by Clipperton Finance
Beyond the mega VC deals such as Delivery Hero (food delivery), Blablacar (car sharing) or Adyen (online payments), three companies in Switzerland are mentioned in the top charts with GetYourGuide (travel), Xeltis (medtech) and Biocartis (biotech).
InnovationFinancingUpdate_January-2015
2014 marks a landmark year for European innovation
financing with almost $8b invested in European
technology companies. As we enter 2015, this year
promises to shed some light on whether last year will be
remembered as a record year at the peak of a cycle or the
beginning of long-lasting momentum.
There is an unquestionable acceleration in the volume and
size of large financings in the European landscape, still far
from current US standards but displaying a few interesting
trends.
• Recent large rounds suggest the new generation of
potential European unicorns , aiming to become the
successors to Spotify, Criteo or Zalando: fast growth
companies such as BlaBlaCar (car sharing), Adyen (online
payment) or Delivery Hero (food delivery)
• The new stars in the making stem mainly from a few
specific segments: new online payment solutions, fintech
marketplaces such as Funding Circle and most notably from
vertical consumer marketplaces
• Following the steps of Rocket Internet companies,
European entrepreneurs in the consumer marketplace arena
are showing well executed and rapid global expansion, often
by targeting large markets in emerging countries. This is the
example of BlaBlaCar and the online food delivery players
such as Delivery Hero or Food Panda. In these segments,
European champions are more aggressive in the race to
globalization than their US counterparts. For once, the
small size of each local market in Europe could prove to be an
asset in pushing national leaders to expand quickly abroad
into ever more far reaching market whilst adopting the right
local approach within each region.
Welcome to Ringier Digital Ventures for digital #startups! Factsheet enclosed via @RD_Ventures
Welcome to Ringier Digital Ventures and David Hug who will be seeking interesting digital startups for possible Series A investments.
This is a good news for the Swiss ICT venture ecosystem who has been struggling to access Series A financing.
Ringier is a well known media company with numerous print and online titles (Blick, Scout, DeinDeal, Ticketcorner, overview of their portfolio here).
With a corporate venture fund of CHF 30M, Ringier Digital Ventures aims for 5 to 8 Series A transactions per year in digital startups (with a content component on Switzerland or with novel adtech or media related technology).
Remains to be seen the exact portion of cash and media for equity in the proposed investment rounds. Pure play media for equity rounds are notoriously more complicated as entrepreneurs basically exchange tangible equity against the hopeful results of a media campaign across various print and online properties. I believe it is a good thing that Ringier Digital Ventures can offer a combination of both cash and media, and also offer investment syndication with other equity investors and business angels (a collaboration with http://www.b-to-v.com is also mentioned).
Enclosed here the fact sheet posted by @RD_Ventures on Twitter
I can see several attractive startups in Romandie who should explore this and look forward to receiving feedbacks.
Good news – More VC money for Swiss #startups in 2014
The latest report on venture capital money invested in Switzerland has just been published and compiled by Startupticker.
It highlights a few interesting facts denoting the continued interest from venture investors in Swiss high-tech startups (quoted from the report):
- In 2014, Swiss start-ups collected more than CHF 450 million in 92 financing rounds.
- This represents an increase of about 10 % on the previous year, with the number of funding rounds remaining practically the same.
- More than three quarters of the invested money went to companies in the life sciences sectors, with medtech in particular increasing significantly (with CHF 150M). Investment in ICT companies actually declined (CHF 86M but across a larger number of deals).
- About CHF 200 million was invested in young firms in Vaud in 2014, putting the canton in first place. But Zurich is clearly in the lead with 43 rounds (47 %), followed by Vaud with 21 (23 %).
- Traditionally, in Switzerland, it is difficult to complete financing rounds of between CHF 2 million and CHF 10 million. The number of financing rounds in this area fell again in 2014.
So overall positive and encouraging, but still a lot of of work ahead to support early stage funding.
Unfortunately very little information is available on true IRR rate of returns for investors in this asset class in Switzerland. Pages 16 and 17 of the report interestingly compile 2014 exits, trade sales to US companies in majority (Bitspin to Google, Kooaba to Qualcomm) plus the remarkable IPO of Molecular Partners on SIX in Zürich. A few startups have assuredly delivered positive returns and multiples to their founders and investors (think about Composyt, Sensima, Endosense or Mesa) but overall it seems that we are still missing out on unicorn-like significant exits. Let’s keep pushing and working on it!
Interesting read and more details can be found in the full report
Source with press release in French : http://startupticker.ch/en/news/january-2015/450-millions-pour-les-start-ups-suisses#.VMkTWEtgCX8
#EPFL spin-off #startup COMPOSYT Light Labs acquired by INTEL
Congratulations to Eric & Mickaël for the acquisition by Intel! Well done.
The venture has developed an impressive novel display for smart glasses.
Proud to have supported such an exciting venture and great team in their development and financing in 2014.
Lausanne, Switzerland – January 20, 2015: COMPOSYT LIGHT LABS SA acquired by Intel Corporation. The EPFL spin-off completed the transaction with Intel at the end of 2014. The four founders Eric Tremblay, David Ziegler, Mickaël Guillaumée and Christophe Moser thank all the partners and supporters who helped in the development of the company.
See also additional later coverage by Startupticker
Great tips on hiring and fund raising by @firstround on the only things #founders need to focus on
Interesting read by First Round Partner Rob Hayes sharing experience on hiring, fund raising and strategic vision.
‘Hayes started investing in early-stage startup founders a decade ago, and he always gets the same question: “What should I be doing right now?” Through this experience, he’s narrowed down his answer to three things. Patzer did a brilliant job at all three, and notably the most important thing on the list: Hiring the right people. “The other two are don’t run out of money and always have a North Star,” says Hayes.
While each of these pieces presents a huge challenge, this framework can be very powerful. “Founders who achieve these goals always succeed,” says Hayes’
I particularly like the piece on cash management:
‘DON’T RUN OUT OF MONEY
Only think in terms of cash.
Hayes advises founders to form a strong cash management plan. Right after a round closes, the champagne’s flowing and everyone’s excited — the last thing you want to do is sit down and chart out how to spend that money over the next 18 months. You certainly don’t want to think about fundraising all over again. But you need to.
“Things might seem like peaches and cream, but you have to ask yourself immediately, ‘What if things don’t go exactly as I expect them to?’”
His advice? Consider putting a venture debt line in place, and if you do, try to forget about it just as fast. “You want it there, but don’t plan to use it,” Hayes says. “It only costs a few thousand dollars to set this up, and hopefully that’s all it will ever cost you, but it will give you peace of mind.”
When he asks to see entrepreneurs’ cash management plans, he often sees this debt line included in runway calculations. This is asking for trouble. “You want the debt there, but you have to know what your business and your spend should look like without it. Pretend the money doesn’t exist. Don’t even talk about it or you’ll treat it like a rainy day fund you can dig into. Don’t let optimism blind you to the need for a rainy day option all the time.”
“Founders should be worried about cash on-hand all the time. Even if employees love you, they won’t stay if you can’t pay them.”
Your cash management plan also shouldn’t include assumed or projected revenue. “I hear it all the time, some founder saying, ‘This is where revenue will start flowing in, so we can do X, Y and Z,’” says Hayes. “I want to see a cash plan that assumes absolutely zero revenue, because you never know.”
One of the best things you can do is share your cash plan (sans debt line and revenue) with your investors and advisors. It builds immediate accountability. You want to make sure that if something happens, someone will be there to ask, “What the hell? What happened?”
“It’s crazy how often people miss this,” says Hayes. “In the early days, know that it’s only about cash. That’s all the money you have to spend and should be spending.”
Read on to learn:
- Why you should spend more than 50% of your time on hiring even if it feels like the wrong choice, and how to get the ball rolling.
- Concrete plans to protect your runway and minimize fundraising time.
- What it means to have a North Star and how to define your own.
http://firstround.com/article/Heres-the-Advice-I-Give-All-of-Our-First-Time-Founders
#Fintech opportunities for #entrepreneurs – very interesting post by @robmoff
Thank you @robmoff for sharing very interesting insights and analysis on fintech segmentation and opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors. In Switzerland I believe there are interesting opportunities to disrupt the consumer mortgage market.
https://medium.com/@robmoff/where-next-for-fintech-investing-in-2015-252236a1a9cb
- Payments and short term credit, which have seen a lot of the investment attention of the last few years, are less than 10% of the market
- Some enormous segments (pensions, mortgages) have seen very little startup activity. There are good reasons for this: these are hard markets to go after, requiring lots of capital, and where customer acquisition costs are paid back over years or decades, not months. But there should be opportunities for smart entrepreneurs.
- Other segments are also large, and less intimidating, but have not yet seen huge volumes of VC investment e.g. Current Accounts and Investments. Startup activity is starting to pick up fast in both of these segments, but there are not yet clear winners and plenty of opportunity remains.
BlueFactory Fribourg
Promising projects in #Fribourg with Cardinal beer production industrial heritage site #blueFactory to be transformed in high tech hub. Great discussion with new Director Jacques Laurent exposing his exciting vision.
Looking forward!
Solid market positioning make the difference
Working on a BP and sharing this great tip and fairly simple formula with the venture team:
“You need to position your product in the mind of your user,” says Jackson. “And that requires taking your potential users into account, assessing the product’s strengths and weaknesses, and considering your competition. There are so many products out there, and people are busy. You have to know who you are.” She offers a fairly simple formula that combines all of these criteria:
For (target customer)
Who (statement of need or opportunity),
(Product name) is a (product category)
That (statement of key benefit).
Unlike (competing alternative)
(Product name)(statement of primary differentiation).
For World Wide Web users
who enjoy books,
Amazon is a retail bookseller
that provides instant access to over 1.1 million books.
Unlike traditional book retailers,
Amazon provides a combination of extraordinary convenience, low prices and comprehensive selection.
More tips and source http://firstround.com/article/The-30-Best-Pieces-of-Advice-for-Entrepreneurs-in-2014
Autonomous vehicles soon to be operated by BestMile at EPFL
Good article in today’s edition of Le Temps (in French) profiling mobility solution provider http://bestmile.com
Nestlé Health Science to Invest $65 Million in a Biotech Start-Up
Significant new investment from Nestlé Health Science.
‘Four years after opening for business, a subsidiary of Nestlé specializing in nutritional therapy is striking one of its most prominent investments to date with a bet on experimental treatments for the bacteria within the human body.
Nestlé Health Science plans to announce on Tuesday that it has invested $65 million in Seres Health, a start-up based in Cambridge, Mass., that focuses on restoring the “microbiome” — the host of microorganisms that provide vital functions for humans. The company’s current focus includes treatments for infectious diseases as well as metabolic and inflammatory illnesses.’
Source : DealBook of the NYT
Is private equity managed by angels?!
Very good editorial article published (in French) in Le Temps on 29.12.2014 by private equity expert Hans van Swaay.
It outlines the value from business angels in startups (increasing by 25% their chances of survival after 4 years according to a study «The Consequences of Entrepreneurial Finance: Evidence from Angel Financings», by William Kerr, Josh Lerner and Antoinette Schoar) and concludes that ‘the only coherent way to make money in private equity is to make portfolio companies better’. Cannot agree more!
Le private equity est-il géré par des anges
Source: http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/f097e190-8ec2-11e4-894e-3285b5d7eb25/Le_private_equity_est-il_géré_par_des_anges




You must be logged in to post a comment.